Trimming the Fringe of Suburbia

By: Chaz Wilke - Staff Writer
suburbia1-725px

There is no more potent image of American prosperity than a sprawling tree-lined street filled with large single-family homes. In a word: suburbia – born in the late 1940s, it came of age in the ’50s as America prospered from runaway economic expansion while the rest of the world rebuilt after World War II.

We built a countrywide web of interstates to connect cities and states. This helped suburbs recede further from city centers as families sought a larger slice of the American Dream, with hopes of bigger houses and broader lawns.

“We created urban sprawl, which spread people further and further apart — further away from their jobs and into communities that weren’t designed to meet their needs,” says Leigh Gallagher, an editor at Fortune magazine and author of The End of the Suburbs.

Sixty years later, Americans are getting torn away from the dream that embraced the United States for decades. Those once idyllic sprawling suburbs are dying. Many social and economic variables that once made sprawl so appealing are changing, and we should have all seen this coming.

Unfortunately, there’s a nasty blinding consequence to living within a dream.

Waking From Slumber

In the 1950s, America was rapidly laying down infrastructure and expanding townships that radiated out from central cities as fast as construction could allow.

In The End of the Suburbs, Gallagher acknowledges that the baby boomer generation grew up believing the suburban single-family home was the epitome of the American Dream. But rising fuel costs, economic downturn, Millennials marrying less and later in life, smaller family sizes and increased interest in urban living have created a situation where urban sprawl has essentially halted.

Rules of the Game

suburbia2-725px

No matter where you might be in America, the fringe of suburbia appears the same: A sprawling suburban town with large homes, broad roadways and distant, isolated strip malls. The residents’ cars are likely status symbols as much as they are necessity. Large, luxury SUVs fill the unnecessarily wide suburban roads as residents race to drop the girls at ballet before picking junior up at soccer practice.

Many of these new outlying towns were built with the presumption there would be a constant influx of new residents. There is a need for a continual stream of new homeowner taxes, fees and economic dollars to prop up the cost of running each burgeoning town.

But, as more residents are opting to live closer to and within city limits, fewer are moving out to these distant outlying towns. Reasons include the fact that living near work or entertainment might offset the cost of urban living. Tal F writes on his blog, The Greenway Commuter, “It was only after trying out our third suburban community in as many years that we started looking for a different kind of neighborhood.” He adds, “We tried hard to go out for entertainment while living there, but whenever we did, it was always some place far, at least a 20 minute drive away.”

Something Must Have Seemed Off

Think about getting groceries without driving to the store. Does that sound impossible? How many miles do you need to drive for milk? Is it more than 10?

Over the decades of prosperity, American towns stretched and sprawled, giving every homeowner the opportunity to grab more land and space than needed. “But somewhere between leafy neighborhoods built around lively railroad villages and the shiny new subdivisions in cornfields on the way to Iowa that bill themselves as suburbs of Chicago, we took our wish for privacy too far. The suburbs overshot their mandate,” says Leigh Gallagher in a Time.com op-ed.

That overshoot of a sustainable suburbia is not solely the fault of greedy homeowners. Civil engineers and city planners prepared the fringe suburbs for a rapidly-increasing population, even when current homeowners protested. Civil engineer Charles Marohn explained his realization in a 2010 blog post, “Confessions of a Recovering Engineer:”

“When [homeowners] objected to the cost of the wider, faster, treeless road that would turn their peaceful, front yard into the viewing area for a drag strip unless they built a concrete barricade along their front property line, I informed them that progress was sometimes expensive, but these standards have been shown to work across the state, the country and the world and I could not compromise with their safety.”

Marohn later understood the impact of his forward-thinking. “In retrospect I understand that this was utter insanity. Wider, faster, treeless roads not only ruin our public places, they kill people.”

In a strange twist, those sprawling suburban streets once viewed so idyllic are now proven to be treacherous. “In fact, recent studies show that living in Manhattan is safer than living in the suburbs (!) when you account for traffic deaths,” Tal F says.

Suburban Poverty on the Rise

suburbia3-725px

Those with income flexibility will likely leave the suburbs for homes closer to city centers. Those that can’t afford to move will see these sprawling suburban towns turn into something far less idyllic: slums.

Professor Peter Newman of the Perth Australia-based, Curtin University, says “‘if we continue to roll out new land releases and suburbs that are car-dependent, they will become the slums of the future.” Newman’s reasoning is that public transit will soon be prohibitively expensive to run from outlying suburbs to city centers.

Those who depend on public transit may find themselves stranded in a remote suburban outpost, cut off from the economic engine that would normally supply jobs and prosperity.

“If you don’t own a car in the suburbs, you’re screwed. And if you do, you’re extremely vulnerable to shocks in gas prices—and that’s why some analysts and urban planners speculated long years ago that suburbs are becoming the next slums,” says Vice senior editor Brian Merchant. “Newman is right: urban sprawl is finished,” he adds.

Digging into the hard economic data, Elizabeth Kneebone and Alan Berube of the Brookings Institute have revealed a grim diagnosis for outlying suburbs.

“Poverty rates do remain higher in cities and rural communities than elsewhere. But for three decades the poor population has grown fastest in suburbs,” say Kneebone and Berube in Confronting Suburban Poverty in America.

suburbia-brookings-infographic-725px[Click on image to download infographic PDF from confrontingsuburbanpoverty.org]

Poverty in the suburbs has grown by a scale of 2-to-1 compared to urban poverty growth in the past decade. The Infographic above, provided by Kneebone and Berube explains the statistics that prove how suburban poverty has grown, and is expected to continue growing significantly faster in communities far from cities.

Moving Forward

suburbia4-725px
Stuart Monk / Shutterstock.com [cropped from original]

“Many older suburbs are still going strong, and real estate developers are beginning to build new suburban neighborhoods that are mixed-use and pedestrian-friendly, a movement loosely known as New Urbanism,” says Leigh Gallagher.

It isn’t always the search for hip culture that drives people from these outlying suburbs, sometimes it is merely the need for a walkable, sustainable life. “Having high-quality local amenities within easy walking distance is very important to us,” Tal F says.

The suburban towns that are able to adapt to this concept of New Urbanism will likely thrive for decades to come. Unfortunately that leaves many towns across America out of luck. The gathering storm of social and economic variables will likely lead an increasing number of small outlying towns to an unfortunate and dismal future.

Chaz Wilke is an employee of Deka Marketing Group. Deka Marketing Group receives payment from advertisers on HomeLiving101.